search Brooke's site
find Brooke on social media
Blog Index
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
Navigation
« The Beatles: Solomon, Aaron, Pul, and Daniel | Main | Visual Babel (Re-acquiring Scripts) »

COS in a Year: Anyone Else In?

I don’t normally make resolutions for the New Year, but Charles’ suggestion to read Context of Scripture (Brill link) in a year…well, that’s like making a resolution to, um, read really fun stuff every day.

Charles’ reading schedule (see PDF link in his post) offers enough variety to keep any one section from becoming deadening, while also providing enough continuity to keep the “C” in COS. Most of the daily readings are short enough that I’ll have time to make the most of the footnotes and, where appropriate, lexical helps.

I am caught up so far. Is anybody else giving it a shot?

Reader Comments (8)

Oooh, me too! This is a perfect use for JP's excellent work here:

http://www.accordancebible.com/about/articles/cos.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.accordancebible.com/about/articles/cos.php

January 13, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBryan Bibb

[...] yes, Brooke called my attention to Charles’ challenge for us to read The Context of Scripture through in [...]

Me too.

January 13, 2010 | Unregistered Commentertleves

But wouldn't it be more fun to have bilingual editions of the COS materials? I would rather read through COS with normalized Sumerian, Akkadian, Ugaritic, Aramaic, Phoenician, and Egyptian on one side, and English on the other.

I admit I've forgotten my Sumerian and I never learned Egyptian. But still.

January 13, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Hobbins

I'm with you there, John: then my joy would be complete! And while I've never had Sumerian, I would love to have a good chunk of bilingual Sumerian texts ready to hand, alongside comparable Akkadian and Egyptian stuff, and enjoy myself seeing what I could puzzle out over time of the Sumerian. If anything, I'd be more inclined to hunt down an opportunity to pick up the Sumerian.

January 13, 2010 | Unregistered Commenteranummabrooke

That would be very nice, John. Also, if they would include more of some of the selections--like the 50 names of Marduk in Enuma Elish-- it would be better as well.

January 14, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterCharles Halton

There were some pretty important contexts to which Ecclesiastes belongs that were left out as well--Shiduri's advice to Gilgamesh not being the least of them.

January 14, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJoseph Kelly

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>