<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anumma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anumma.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anumma.com</link>
	<description>Conversation on Old Testament/Hebrew Bible and Higher Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:53:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Exegetical Thesis as (Digital) Storytelling by tim</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/30/exegesis-as-storytelling/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2315#comment-2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s one problem with the fragmented (because short more focused segments seem to work better in e-texts) nature of multi-part posts, people want everything in part one ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one problem with the fragmented (because short more focused segments seem to work better in e-texts) nature of multi-part posts, people want everything in part one <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Exegetical Thesis as (Digital) Storytelling by anummabrooke</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/30/exegesis-as-storytelling/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anummabrooke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2315#comment-2113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tim! Yeah, in the second part, I plan to address the &quot;what does the student actually do to make it &#039;digital&#039;&quot; piece. Here, I wanted to clear the decks a bit first, by arguing that even a straight-up thesis project or a presentation of data has (potentially or even ideally) a narrative or &quot;storytelling&quot; component.

Where this began for me is in an initial attraction to some projects in &quot;Digital Storytelling&quot; that I saw at a conference. I&#039;ll link a few examples in the next part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim! Yeah, in the second part, I plan to address the &#8220;what does the student actually do to make it &#8216;digital&#8217;&#8221; piece. Here, I wanted to clear the decks a bit first, by arguing that even a straight-up thesis project or a presentation of data has (potentially or even ideally) a narrative or &#8220;storytelling&#8221; component.</p>
<p>Where this began for me is in an initial attraction to some projects in &#8220;Digital Storytelling&#8221; that I saw at a conference. I&#8217;ll link a few examples in the next part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Exegetical Thesis as (Digital) Storytelling by Tim Bulkeley</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/30/exegesis-as-storytelling/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Bulkeley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2315#comment-2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really interesting. I&#039;d like to hear a bit more or have an example of the storytelling as just reading this I am not too sure what you mean the student to actually do...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting. I&#8217;d like to hear a bit more or have an example of the storytelling as just reading this I am not too sure what you mean the student to actually do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetics of Scribal Culture in Inner-Biblical Oralities of Allusive Redaction-Echoes, and Stuff by Joseph Kelly</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/16/poetics-of-scribal-culture/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2302#comment-2090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to talk sometime. I found your article in the Library journal insightful. It&#039;s in my bib, which is 20pp+ right now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to talk sometime. I found your article in the Library journal insightful. It&#8217;s in my bib, which is 20pp+ right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetics of Scribal Culture in Inner-Biblical Oralities of Allusive Redaction-Echoes, and Stuff by anummabrooke</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/16/poetics-of-scribal-culture/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anummabrooke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2302#comment-2080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph, we should definitely talk. Your topic is ambitious, but really relevant. There&#039;s a lot of sloppiness out there. I&#039;m writing an article on &quot;inner-biblical interpretation&quot; for an encyclopedia, and there&#039;s a paragraph in progress on how &quot;intertextuality&quot; is different, while older titles using the term persist in the record (obviously) and the field still often insists on using the term. I&#039;ll ask you offline how far along you are! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, we should definitely talk. Your topic is ambitious, but really relevant. There&#8217;s a lot of sloppiness out there. I&#8217;m writing an article on &#8220;inner-biblical interpretation&#8221; for an encyclopedia, and there&#8217;s a paragraph in progress on how &#8220;intertextuality&#8221; is different, while older titles using the term persist in the record (obviously) and the field still often insists on using the term. I&#8217;ll ask you offline how far along you are! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetics of Scribal Culture in Inner-Biblical Oralities of Allusive Redaction-Echoes, and Stuff by Joseph Kelly</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2012/01/16/poetics-of-scribal-culture/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2302#comment-2071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Brook, 

Have I told you that I am writing my dissertation on this subject? My two aims are to lay out the philosophical differences between &quot;intertextuality&quot; (poststructural literary theory or Theory) and &quot;allusion&quot; (representing a more traditionalist literary criticism) and to address how they should be applied in biblical studies. And yes, I am aware this topic is ambitious/going to kill me.

I had not seen Carr&#039;s new book, so thanks for the resource. Konrad Schmid just published the first major work in German on the subject. Blast him! 

Schriftgelehrte Traditionsliteratur: Fallstudien zur innerbiblischen Schriftauslegung im Alten Testament

Benjamin Sommer is still has the best work out there on this subject, in my opinion.

jk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brook, </p>
<p>Have I told you that I am writing my dissertation on this subject? My two aims are to lay out the philosophical differences between &#8220;intertextuality&#8221; (poststructural literary theory or Theory) and &#8220;allusion&#8221; (representing a more traditionalist literary criticism) and to address how they should be applied in biblical studies. And yes, I am aware this topic is ambitious/going to kill me.</p>
<p>I had not seen Carr&#8217;s new book, so thanks for the resource. Konrad Schmid just published the first major work in German on the subject. Blast him! </p>
<p>Schriftgelehrte Traditionsliteratur: Fallstudien zur innerbiblischen Schriftauslegung im Alten Testament</p>
<p>Benjamin Sommer is still has the best work out there on this subject, in my opinion.</p>
<p>jk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Story&#8221; (Zondervan): Reading the Bible? by Mike Ward</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2010/02/01/the-story-zondervan-reading/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=1344#comment-2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Story is not so much a bible as it is a marketing campaign.

Zondervan&#039;s best customers are naturally Christians, but there&#039;s a limit to how many bibles you can sell to Christians who already own multiple bibles that they never use for anything anyway.

The Story allows Zondervan to sell an edited bible as if it is something new. They&#039;re marketing it to congregations more aggressively than to individuals so if a church decides to use the program they can hope to sell a bible to every single member.

While that&#039;s quite a haul, the financial icing on the cake is that Zondervan then gets to sell the church all kinds of supplemental materials.

The omissions in The Story are sometimes very subtle. Obviously, some books and whole sections of others have been removed, but sometimes only a few verses are removed with nothing in The Story to indicate anything is missing.

When long section are removed there is usually a brief synopsis of what is missing, but these are often incomplete and reek of personal interpretation.

Ironically, The Story is being embraced by Christians who cry heresy when scholars using textual criticism say that the bible was edited and compiled from previous sources. Generally, conservative Christians believe God would never have allowed that to happen to his inspired word, but they are perfectly happy now that Zondervan is doing just that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Story is not so much a bible as it is a marketing campaign.</p>
<p>Zondervan&#8217;s best customers are naturally Christians, but there&#8217;s a limit to how many bibles you can sell to Christians who already own multiple bibles that they never use for anything anyway.</p>
<p>The Story allows Zondervan to sell an edited bible as if it is something new. They&#8217;re marketing it to congregations more aggressively than to individuals so if a church decides to use the program they can hope to sell a bible to every single member.</p>
<p>While that&#8217;s quite a haul, the financial icing on the cake is that Zondervan then gets to sell the church all kinds of supplemental materials.</p>
<p>The omissions in The Story are sometimes very subtle. Obviously, some books and whole sections of others have been removed, but sometimes only a few verses are removed with nothing in The Story to indicate anything is missing.</p>
<p>When long section are removed there is usually a brief synopsis of what is missing, but these are often incomplete and reek of personal interpretation.</p>
<p>Ironically, The Story is being embraced by Christians who cry heresy when scholars using textual criticism say that the bible was edited and compiled from previous sources. Generally, conservative Christians believe God would never have allowed that to happen to his inspired word, but they are perfectly happy now that Zondervan is doing just that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ask a Biblical Scholar Anything by cliff j.</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2010/08/26/ask-a-biblical-scholar/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cliff j.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=1906#comment-2049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worthless. No Bible scholar ever responded. Why set up this website if there&#039;s no follow-up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worthless. No Bible scholar ever responded. Why set up this website if there&#8217;s no follow-up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Modern Israeli Music in Hebrew Class by jazmin</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2011/02/18/modern-music-in-hebrew-class/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jazmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=2058#comment-2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this style of music although I haven&#039;t heard it before. It is interesting how diffrent cultures express there music and seeing as i love the chart music it is very diffrent to what i am used to listening to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this style of music although I haven&#8217;t heard it before. It is interesting how diffrent cultures express there music and seeing as i love the chart music it is very diffrent to what i am used to listening to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biblical Studies Carnival LI by &#62;Biblical Studies Carnival # 51 &#124; Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament</title>
		<link>http://anumma.com/2010/03/01/biblical-studies-carnival-li/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#62;Biblical Studies Carnival # 51 &#124; Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anumma.com/?p=1443#comment-2041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &gt;G. Brooke Lester has posted the Fifty-first Biblical Studies Carnival at Anumma. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt;G. Brooke Lester has posted the Fifty-first Biblical Studies Carnival at Anumma. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

